Nutrition †Food Essay

In our todays society, especially western countries, the comeback of ready intellectual nourishment seems to be at the top of every wellness link up debate. As these debates become more controversial, the query of who bears the responsibility frame unanswered. In his es ordinate, Dont Blame the Eater, David Zinczenko attempts to answer this key question by placing the greater responsibility of Americas obesity and juvenile(prenominal) fast intellectual nourishment related health income tax returns on the fast regimen industries.Contrary to Zinczenkos argument, Raldy Balko, in his essay, What You Eat Is Your Business, states that, bully deal should take willpower of their health and well-being, and ar at that placefore accountable for what and how they eat. Although both Zinczenko and Balko address the issue of responsibility, though with contrast, but valid arguments, Zinczenko seems to present a more convert argument due to the steering in which he explains the p olitics of regimen, the way in which our lifestyles be altered by what we eat, and things we can do to transmute the way we see food and its role in our passs.Although Zinczenko hold consumers responsible to an ex ecstasyt, he blames the fast food industries for the emanation tread of obesity and different health issues related to fast food due to their calamity to stick out labels for their products. Zinczenko convincingly supports his claim by noting statistical data that shows the rise in money spent to treat diabetes. Before 1994, diabetes in children was generally caused by a genetic disorder save 5 percent of childishness cases were obesity related, or fictitious character 2 diabetes.Today, according to the National Institutes of Health, Type 2 diabetes accounts for at least 30 percent of all new childhood cases of diabetes in this country(Zinczenko 392). He argues that, if the fast food companies are regulated so that they are responsible for their food contents, by providing becoming labels, than consumers will make informed food excerptions. Contrary to Zinczenko, Balko argues that what one take in should be a matter of personal responsibility. To Balkos credit, I cogitate that slew should take personal responsibility for their health by adding a sensible diet and exercise to their routines.Where I differ from Balko is when he says that governing restrictions on food are a result of people reservation scummy food choices. According to Balko, a society where everyone is responsible for everyone elses well-being is a society more apt to accept disposal restrictions (397). I think Balkos argument in this regard, is a egotistical one, and is an attempt to exempt the rich from paying their fair share of taxes that would otherwise benefit the poor or some middle families who cannot afford the high school embody of health insurance.Both Zinczenko and Balko seem to agree on the rising health costs that are somehow a result of fast fo od, these two authors seem to differ on reasons. Zinczenko argues that health care cost is on the rise because of diseases caused by fast food due to the failure of fast food companies to post labels and that consumers should not be blame for it. However, Balko argues that it is so that, we allow the government to come between us and our waistline (396).Balko states that, the more the government continues to fund health issues that are direct attribute of poor food/health choices, the more people will continue to eat on fast food and engage not in an telling diet and exercise regimen. (398) The growth of the fast food industry and the drift at which fast food is consumed is so fast, and its accompanying risks of obesity and related cardiovascular diseases have become a societal epidemic. Zinczenko blames the fast food industries for the spring in the rate to which obesity have grown in the United States.Even though Zinczenko is right slightly the rising rate of obesity, and tha t the consumption of fast food forms part of its etiology, the thesis of his argument cannot be proven and therefore cannot form the basis for his claims against the fast food companies since there are other contributing factors regarding the cause, onset, and progression of obesity. Obesity is also biologically linked. These biological attributors include genetics, hormones, enzymes, and vitamins and minerals. Some people have fat in their genes that, no matter what they do, they are just fat.Others have issues with hormonal imbalances and or inadequate enzymatic actions that would aid in the adequate digestion and absorption of reliable foods. Fast food is just one of the many environmental attributes associated with obesity. So Zinczenko can accurately make his case against the fast food industries for providing labels so as to enable consumers make informed food choices and not a case of obesity. Some terms, people are too fast to pass sound judgment on others, especially peop le that are obese. I am equally guilty of the accusation myself.I work as a hold back at a nursing home facility and, in roughly cases, when staff member comes to me complaining of headache, first thing I say to them is lets check your gillyflower pressure and, God forbid, the blood pressure is elevated, or if that person just look fat to me, my future(a) comment is, it is because of all the junk you eat. My judgment, though may be incorrect, is found on the fact that most of these staff members are single parents, live in inner cities, and have a total commute time of two hours to and from work.Not to mention, some of them have more than one job. However, these people are being made to feel guilty close something that is solely out their control. In most instances, their wages arent even nice to meet up with their rents and utilities bills. Fast food comes handy in such(prenominal) instance where one can spend ten dollars and get ten cheeseburgers to feed a family of three to five versus going to the grocery insert where each healthy ingredient is almost equivalent to the price of the consummate dinner comprising of fast food.People fall back on fast food because it is cheap. Zinczenko explains that his parents were split up and that he had to live with his mother who worked immense hours just to make the monthly bills. Lunch and dinner, for me, was a daily choice between McDonalds, Taco Bell, Kentucky Fried Chicken or Pizza Hut. (Zinczenko 391). In Zinczenkos case, his lifestyle is altered because fast food is his only resource since his family is dysfunctional. His single mother has to work very hard to pay bills and can him a repast. It doesnt matter the kind of meal.A meal is a meal, especially for someone who doesnt have the time to prepare a home cooked meal. The people afflicted with fast food related obesity are not to blame for what they eat because they have very detailed or no options regarding what they eat due to all of the above reasons. However, to Balkos point, while people may not have the option active what they eat, they have the option to control how they eat. Zinczenko states in his essay that fast food is the only available options for an American kid to get an affordable meal, and so, he urges his readers not to blame the Eater (392).But as with Zinczenko, we are well aware of the role fast food play in our lives. We understand that, though fast may be one, or the only available meal choice that we have, the way we eat can cooperate us determine the role these foods play in our lives. Zinczenko supports his argument about the role food play in his life by heavy(p) information about his pre-college weight. By age 15, I had packed 212 pounds of boggy tallow on my once lanky 5-foot-10 frame (392). Even Zinczenko call backs that, consumers are as equally responsible for the way they eat.However, he maintains his argument that the fast food companies bare the greater responsibility. In conclusion, both the eater and the producer are responsible for fast food related obesity, but I believe that the fast industries should bare the greater responsibility. Fast food companies must provide their consumers with proper food labels that enable them to make inform decision about what they eat. Label should not be falsified or misleading, like in the shell giving by Zinczenko about the misleading label on the squawker salad (393).He refers to the salad as not healthy and that it is a caloric death- noose aimed at eaters who will not suspect it. Although Balko makes some really good points, his objectives seem to me as a means to an end. Zinczenko cautions that there are some or no alternatives to what we eat and that things have to change. Balko cautions that allowing food regulations for labels means allow the government between you and your waistline. In either case, we as a people have a responsibility to consider what and how we eat.